Challenging the capability approach in the context of environmental, ecological and multispecies justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23984/fjhas.121735Keywords:
capability approach, environmental and ecological justice, intra- and intergenerational justice, multispecies justice, animal claim rightsAbstract
The main objective of this paper is to analyze the challenges in applying Nussbaum’s capability approach to animals, as refracted through the lens of environmental justice (justice among humans on environmental issues and risks) and ecological justice (justice to non-human nature) in Schlosberg’s sense. Comparing and contrasting intra- and intergenerational justice for animals within the environmental and ecological justice frameworks, I demonstrate why capabilities-based multispecies justice can provide some benefits in overcoming ecological vulnerability. In this context, I point out the methodological pitfalls that environmental and ecological justice face in their attempts at eradicating unequal vulnerabilities embedded into some either-or dilemmas by exploring how the vulnerabilities in question negatively affect animals’ positive and negative rights.
References
Abbey, Ruth. 2007. “Rawlsian Resources for Animal Ethics”. Ethics and the Environment, 12 (1): 1-22.
Adams, William M., Ros Aveling, Dan Brockington, Barney Dickson, Jo Elliot, Jon Hutton, Dilys Roe et al. 2004. “Biodiversity Conservation and the Eradication of Poverty.” Science, 306: 1146-1149.
Baxter, Brian. 2005. A Theory of Ecological Justice. New York: Routledge.
Biermann, Frank, and Agni Kalfagianni. 2020. “Planetary Justice: A Research Framework.” Earth System Governance, 6: 100049.
Bryner, Gary C. 2002. “Assessing Claims of Environmental Justice: Conceptual Frameworks”. In Justice and Natural Resources: Concepts, Strategies, and Applications, edited by Kathryn M. Mutz, Gary C. Bryner, and Douglas S. Kenney, 31-56. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Celermajer, Danielle, David Schlosberg, Lauren Rickards et al. 2020. “Multispecies Justice: Theories, Challenges, and a Research Agenda for Environmental Politics.” Environmental Politics, 29: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1827608
Chao, Sophie, Bolender, Karin, and Eben Kirksey (eds.). 2022. The Promise of Multispecies Justice. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Cripps, Elizabeth. 2010. “Saving the Polar Bear, Saving the World: Can the Capabilities Approach Do Justice to Humans, Animals and Ecosystems?” Res Publica, 16 (1): 1-22.
Davidson, Jennifer. 2018. “Justice for All?: The Shortcomings and Potentials of the Capabilities Approach for Protecting Animals.” Animal Law Review, Vol. 24 (1): 1-41.
Felipe, Sonia. 2005. “Rawls’s Legacy: A Limited Possibility of a Non-speciesist Environmental Justice.” Ethic@, 4 (1): 23-37.
Francione, Gary L. 1996. Rain without Thunder: The Ideology of the Animal Rights Movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Garner, Robert. 2013. A Theory of Justice for Animals: Animal Rights in a Nonideal World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Glotzbach, Stefanie, and Stefan Baumgärtner. 2009. “The Relationship between Intra- and Intergenerational Ecological Justice. Determinants of Goal Conflicts and Synergies in Sustainability Policy.” University of Lüneburg Working Paper Series in Economics, 141: 1-33.
Kortetmäki, Teea. 2017. “Justice in and to Nature. An Application of the Broad Framework of Environmental and Ecological Justice.” PhD diss., University of Jyväskylä.
Lynch, Kathleen. 2021. “Affective Equality and Social Justice”. In Paradigms of Justice. Redistribution, Recognition, and Beyond, edited by Denise Calentano and Luigi Caranti, 118-140. London and New York: Routledge.
Melin, Anders, and David Kronlid. 2016. “Should We Ascribe Capabilities to Sentient Animals? A Critical Analysis of the Extension of Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach.” De Ethica. A Journal of Philosophical, Theological and Applied Ethics, Vol 3 (2): 53-63.
Nussbaum, Martha. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, Martha. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John. 1971. Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rowlands, Mark. 1997. “Contractarianism and Animal Rights.” Journal of Applied Philosophy, 14 (3): 235-247.
Rowlands, Mark. 2017. “Moral Subjects”. In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Animal Minds, edited by Kristin Andrews and Jacob Beck, 469-474. London and New York: Routledge.
Schlosberg, David. 2007. Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.
Schlosberg, David. 2012. “Justice, Ecological Integrity, and Climate Change”. In Ethical Adaptation to Climate Change. Human Virtues of the Future, edited by A. Thompson and J. Bendik-Keymer, 165-183. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schlosberg, David. 2013. “Theorising Environmental Justice: The Expanding Sphere of a Discourse.” Environmental Politics, Vol. 22 (1): 37-55.
Sen, Amartya K. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred Press.
Sen, Amartya K. 2004. “Why We Should Preserve the Spotted Owl?” London Review of Books, 26, No. 3: 10-11.
Serafimova, Silviya. 2019. “Mapping (Un)Common Space of Ethical Gradualism in the Era of the Anthropocene.” TRACE: Journal for Human-Animal Studies, No. 5: 82–96. https://doi.org/10.23984/fjhas.77853.
Singer, Brent A. 1998. ”An Extension of Rawls’ Theory of Justice to Environmental Ethics.” Environmental Ethics, 10 (3): 217-231.
Stucki, Saskia. 2020. “Towards a Theory of Legal Animal Rights: Simple and Fundamental Rights.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 40 (3): 533-560.
Thero, P. Daniel. 1995. “Rawls and Environmental Ethics: A Critical Examination of the Literature.” Environmental Ethics: An Interdisciplinary Journal Dedicated to the Philosophical Aspects of Environmental Problems, Vol. 17 (1): 93-106.
Wienhues, Anna. 2020. Ecological Justice and the Extinction Crisis. Giving Living Beings Their Due. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Wissenburg, Marcel. 2006. “Global and Ecological Justice: Prioritising Conflicting Demands.” Environmental Values, 15: 425-439.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Silviya Serafimova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When sending a manuscript the author(s) accept the digital publishing contract (please open the link and read it!). The publishing contract covers the publication of the manuscript on the digital versions of the Trace journal according to the Open Access principles and the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/]. (NB! Changed on January 28, 2020!) The conditions allow the author to retain copyright to his/her work and anyone to copy and distribute it for free in any medium and form, changed or unchanged provided that appropriate credit to author(s) is given, a link provided to the license, and any changes are indicated. Information on copyright issues in Finland is given by Kopiosto.
Trace is a scientific journal that doesn't pursue economic gain. Instead, the purpose of the publishing contract is to acknowledge the moral rights of the author(s) to their work and make possible the distribution of results of scientific research in the Trace journal in print as well as in digital form.
The license concerning the metadata of published articles is Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0).
More information about open science in Finland:
